| 'Shall We Hang the Kaiser?' by Lovat Fraser |
The Germans are not as we are. They belong to a lower grade of civilisation. It is true that they are
methodical and industrious, but so are ants; yet no one would think of comparing ants with mankind
made in God's image. All Germany wanted this terrible war, and thought and dreamed of it for years.
Some people tell us that the character of the German tribes changed and deteriorated during the last
forty or fifty years. Nothing is farther from the truth. The character of the "square-heads" has
remained unchanged since primeval times. They are the same to-day as they were when they burst
out of the barren North and glissaded on their shields down the southern slopes of the Alps to the
sack of Rome. They are an agglomeration of tribes which have deliberately, and from time
immemorial, adopted the doctrine of expansion by conquest and loot. There is no incident of the
present war which could not be matched by an examination of their foul exploits more than a
thousand years ago, save only their use of weapons pr6duced by a perversion of science to base uses.
Things Seen in Douai
They are not in the least repentant to-day. They are only angry because they were soundly beaten. If
they had entered English towns as we have entered Cologne and Bonn, there would be a very
different story to tell. No doubt there are exceptions. I have had- German friends to whose
companionship I look back with pleasure. I once made a longish voyage with Herr von Heineken,
now the head of the North German Lloyd. I thought him a "white man" then, and am still inclined to
fancy that I was not mistaken. He was quite a different, stamp of man from the Jew Ballin. But,
collectively, the Germans are brutal and treacherous, and their qualities are not of recent growth.
The thing this country must never lose sight of is the collective guilt of the German nation.
A day or two before the war ended I went into the empty city of Douai. The inhabitants had
vanished, and very few of our troops were there. It was . like a city of the dead. There were not
many external signs of destruction, and one had to go inside the houses to realise the devastation the
Germans had wrought before they fled. Some of the houses were marked " Dangerous," and
evidently contained booby-traps. For the rest, you could open any door in Douai and witness the
same scene. Every scrap of furniture, every picture, every little ornament, had been smashed as if by
men in a frenzy. Nothing was left undestroyed. Upstairs the very mattresses had been ripped up, and
the floors were inches. deep in flock or feathers. There was no bed-room that did not contain
indescribable proofs of the inherent German foulness of mind.
The Americans discovered similar disgusting conditions when they entered the ruined town of
Chateau-Thierry. The same story can be told of town after town in the occupied territories in France
and Belgium. These acts were not spontaneous on the part of the soldiery. It is inconceivable that the
men billeted in every house in Douai should have simultaneously resolved upon committing the same
deeds of malicious destruction and filth. The foul work was done by order of the officers, and the
men obeyed with eager alacrity. It was done not in the first fever-heat of war, like the crimes in
Belgium in 1914, but within a very short time of the armistice.
Culpability Beyond Dispute
Can you wonder that our commanders have sternly forbidden fraternisation with the officers and
men of the German Army and Navy? Can you wonder that our own clean- minded officers will not
shake hands with their German foes? Can you wonder that Admiral Beatty designated the Germans
as "beasts," or that the mild Mr. Balfour said that "brutes they were, and brutes they remain"? I have
seen similar foul acts in disturbances between Hindus and Mohammedans in India, but only on a
small scale in the temples, as the outcome of perverted religious fanaticism, and never in private
houses. I have ridden in the track of the troops in China, and heard of no such conduct, except on
the German trail. I have seen something of the Australian aborigines in the heart of Australia, tribes
usually supposed to be the lowest in the grade of humanity. I left Douai feeling that collectively, and
in spite of shining individual exceptions, the Germans to-day are mentally the most degraded and
contemptible race on earth. Their cowardice and shamelessness in defeat, the flight of the Kaiser and
their leaders, with the exception of stout old Hindenburg, the effrontery of the populace in the
Rhineland, are all factors which confirm this strong and ineffaceable impression.
Burke said that "You cannot indict a whole nation." It may be so; but the point of this article is that
whatever may be decided about the Kaiser and his immediate confederates, a heavy toll must be
taken of the German nation as a whole. Its culpability is beyond dispute. (end)
from ‘the War Illustrated’ January 11, 1919
methodical and industrious, but so are ants; yet no one would think of comparing ants with mankind
made in God's image. All Germany wanted this terrible war, and thought and dreamed of it for years.
Some people tell us that the character of the German tribes changed and deteriorated during the last
forty or fifty years. Nothing is farther from the truth. The character of the "square-heads" has
remained unchanged since primeval times. They are the same to-day as they were when they burst
out of the barren North and glissaded on their shields down the southern slopes of the Alps to the
sack of Rome. They are an agglomeration of tribes which have deliberately, and from time
immemorial, adopted the doctrine of expansion by conquest and loot. There is no incident of the
present war which could not be matched by an examination of their foul exploits more than a
thousand years ago, save only their use of weapons pr6duced by a perversion of science to base uses.
Things Seen in Douai
They are not in the least repentant to-day. They are only angry because they were soundly beaten. If
they had entered English towns as we have entered Cologne and Bonn, there would be a very
different story to tell. No doubt there are exceptions. I have had- German friends to whose
companionship I look back with pleasure. I once made a longish voyage with Herr von Heineken,
now the head of the North German Lloyd. I thought him a "white man" then, and am still inclined to
fancy that I was not mistaken. He was quite a different, stamp of man from the Jew Ballin. But,
collectively, the Germans are brutal and treacherous, and their qualities are not of recent growth.
The thing this country must never lose sight of is the collective guilt of the German nation.
A day or two before the war ended I went into the empty city of Douai. The inhabitants had
vanished, and very few of our troops were there. It was . like a city of the dead. There were not
many external signs of destruction, and one had to go inside the houses to realise the devastation the
Germans had wrought before they fled. Some of the houses were marked " Dangerous," and
evidently contained booby-traps. For the rest, you could open any door in Douai and witness the
same scene. Every scrap of furniture, every picture, every little ornament, had been smashed as if by
men in a frenzy. Nothing was left undestroyed. Upstairs the very mattresses had been ripped up, and
the floors were inches. deep in flock or feathers. There was no bed-room that did not contain
indescribable proofs of the inherent German foulness of mind.
The Americans discovered similar disgusting conditions when they entered the ruined town of
Chateau-Thierry. The same story can be told of town after town in the occupied territories in France
and Belgium. These acts were not spontaneous on the part of the soldiery. It is inconceivable that the
men billeted in every house in Douai should have simultaneously resolved upon committing the same
deeds of malicious destruction and filth. The foul work was done by order of the officers, and the
men obeyed with eager alacrity. It was done not in the first fever-heat of war, like the crimes in
Belgium in 1914, but within a very short time of the armistice.
Culpability Beyond Dispute
Can you wonder that our commanders have sternly forbidden fraternisation with the officers and
men of the German Army and Navy? Can you wonder that our own clean- minded officers will not
shake hands with their German foes? Can you wonder that Admiral Beatty designated the Germans
as "beasts," or that the mild Mr. Balfour said that "brutes they were, and brutes they remain"? I have
seen similar foul acts in disturbances between Hindus and Mohammedans in India, but only on a
small scale in the temples, as the outcome of perverted religious fanaticism, and never in private
houses. I have ridden in the track of the troops in China, and heard of no such conduct, except on
the German trail. I have seen something of the Australian aborigines in the heart of Australia, tribes
usually supposed to be the lowest in the grade of humanity. I left Douai feeling that collectively, and
in spite of shining individual exceptions, the Germans to-day are mentally the most degraded and
contemptible race on earth. Their cowardice and shamelessness in defeat, the flight of the Kaiser and
their leaders, with the exception of stout old Hindenburg, the effrontery of the populace in the
Rhineland, are all factors which confirm this strong and ineffaceable impression.
Burke said that "You cannot indict a whole nation." It may be so; but the point of this article is that
whatever may be decided about the Kaiser and his immediate confederates, a heavy toll must be
taken of the German nation as a whole. Its culpability is beyond dispute. (end)
from ‘the War Illustrated’ January 11, 1919
| Kaiser Bill, we are coming, With our army over sea. And you forgot our motto. Which is,"Do not tread on me." It’s a job we never started, But we’ll finish Germany; And we’ll hang you, Kaiser William. On the highest linden tree. |
Kaiser Wilhelm was the eldest grandson of Britain's
Queen Victoria and had actually cradled her in his arms
as she lay dying. Like his one time mentor Bismarck,
he was an ardent Anglophile and he often stated that he
could never envisage a war with Britain. At the end of
the war, the opposing nations demanded his abdication,
but the Kaiser refused to give up. In the political chaos
following the war in Germany, Chancellor Max von
Baden announced on his own initiative that the Kaiser
of Germany and King of Prussia, Wilhelm II, had
decided to denounce the throne. The Kaiser, and his
son the Crown Prince, had no choice but to abdicate
and then flee. They avoided capture and left for
Doorn, Holland in November of 1918. With this, the
500-year-old dynasty which had started in 1412, when
Friedrich of Hohenzollern was made Markgraf of
Brandenburg, came to an end. Wilhelm was perhaps
the most reviled man in history at the time, and even
his abdication was not enough for the vindictive
victors, as the article which follows displays.
Queen Victoria and had actually cradled her in his arms
as she lay dying. Like his one time mentor Bismarck,
he was an ardent Anglophile and he often stated that he
could never envisage a war with Britain. At the end of
the war, the opposing nations demanded his abdication,
but the Kaiser refused to give up. In the political chaos
following the war in Germany, Chancellor Max von
Baden announced on his own initiative that the Kaiser
of Germany and King of Prussia, Wilhelm II, had
decided to denounce the throne. The Kaiser, and his
son the Crown Prince, had no choice but to abdicate
and then flee. They avoided capture and left for
Doorn, Holland in November of 1918. With this, the
500-year-old dynasty which had started in 1412, when
Friedrich of Hohenzollern was made Markgraf of
Brandenburg, came to an end. Wilhelm was perhaps
the most reviled man in history at the time, and even
his abdication was not enough for the vindictive
victors, as the article which follows displays.
Dispensing with the old adage, "it takes two to fight", the victors promptly pounced on the defeated
powers and exacted as much revenge...and money.. as humanly possible by pronouncing "war guilt"
solely on the central powers.
powers and exacted as much revenge...and money.. as humanly possible by pronouncing "war guilt"
solely on the central powers.
There can be no doubt that the recent Victory election disclosed a widespread and even passionate
desire on the part of the people of this country to bring the Kaiser and the Crown Prince to trial
before some form of international tribunal. Before we proceed upon such an undertaking, we must
be certain that laws exist under which such a trial is possible. We have been temperate in war, let us
not be intemperate at the peace.
It is understood that the Law Officers of the Crown, and high judicial authorities, have expressed the
opinion that such a trial can be held under existing laws. Sir Herbert Stephen, in whose calm and
impartial mind I have the strongest possible belief, has just declared emphatically—first, that there is
no existing tribunal before which the Kaiser could be brought; second, that it is impossible now to
create an impartial tribunal; and third, that any trial we imposed upon him would be a mock trial, and
therefore "a prostitution of justice." I am no jurist, but to these views I venture to subscribe.
There are impetuous men who say that, if there are no laws to meet the case, we should make them.
Supposing we made such laws, it would be an outrage to make their effect retrospective. At once we
should be brought back to the position of the mock trial. To me it is astonishing that so temperate a
man as Lord George Hamilton has proposed that the Kaiser should be "tried" in Brussels, and if
found guilty, shot against the wall where Nurse Cavell met her unhappy fate.
Justice Before All
I can appreciate his indignation, but not his balance of mind. Just as Nurse Cavell said that
"patriotism is not all," so I would say that "vengeance is not all." The Kaiser richly deserves such an
end, but it would not be just in the eyes of the law.
We in Great Britain have to remember that there is a bigger issue at stake than the shooting or
hanging of the Kaiser. These islands have long been the home of calm, inexorable, impartial justice to
an extent which exists nowhere else in the world. I would let a thousand Kaisers go free rather than
sully the British reputation for strict justice and observance of the law. Wherever I have been
throughout the world I have always found the Englishman respected because he is just. We are a law-
abiding race, and our judicial system, as well as our judiciary, is the admiration of every nation. If we
start killing one man illegally, however, deep his guilt, we do not know in these times where the
process is going to stop. An evil precedent would be created, and we should assuredly have cause to
rue it.
Sir Herbert Stephen points out that, because the Kaiser cannot be "tried," it does not in the least
follow that it is impossible to punish him. Napoleon had no trial, yet we interned him until his death
upon the island of St. Helena. The fact that he was declared an outlaw by the Congress of Vienna,
presumably had no legal sanction. I take it that we based our action upon his surrender as a prisoner
of war. Some similar course could probably be adopted with the Kaiser, though as to its legality I can
express no opinion. What I am chiefly against is the illegal taking of life; and I cannot recall any case
in history where the killing of a monarch under pseudo-legal forms has not in the end done far more
harm than good.
Where public opinion in this country has gone astray is in concentrating all its wrath upon the
contemptible and fugitive Kaiser. He has more blood-guiltiness than any man on earth since Genghiz
Khan, but he does not stand alone. Whatever punishment is meted out to him should be shared by
the men who stood around him.
desire on the part of the people of this country to bring the Kaiser and the Crown Prince to trial
before some form of international tribunal. Before we proceed upon such an undertaking, we must
be certain that laws exist under which such a trial is possible. We have been temperate in war, let us
not be intemperate at the peace.
It is understood that the Law Officers of the Crown, and high judicial authorities, have expressed the
opinion that such a trial can be held under existing laws. Sir Herbert Stephen, in whose calm and
impartial mind I have the strongest possible belief, has just declared emphatically—first, that there is
no existing tribunal before which the Kaiser could be brought; second, that it is impossible now to
create an impartial tribunal; and third, that any trial we imposed upon him would be a mock trial, and
therefore "a prostitution of justice." I am no jurist, but to these views I venture to subscribe.
There are impetuous men who say that, if there are no laws to meet the case, we should make them.
Supposing we made such laws, it would be an outrage to make their effect retrospective. At once we
should be brought back to the position of the mock trial. To me it is astonishing that so temperate a
man as Lord George Hamilton has proposed that the Kaiser should be "tried" in Brussels, and if
found guilty, shot against the wall where Nurse Cavell met her unhappy fate.
Justice Before All
I can appreciate his indignation, but not his balance of mind. Just as Nurse Cavell said that
"patriotism is not all," so I would say that "vengeance is not all." The Kaiser richly deserves such an
end, but it would not be just in the eyes of the law.
We in Great Britain have to remember that there is a bigger issue at stake than the shooting or
hanging of the Kaiser. These islands have long been the home of calm, inexorable, impartial justice to
an extent which exists nowhere else in the world. I would let a thousand Kaisers go free rather than
sully the British reputation for strict justice and observance of the law. Wherever I have been
throughout the world I have always found the Englishman respected because he is just. We are a law-
abiding race, and our judicial system, as well as our judiciary, is the admiration of every nation. If we
start killing one man illegally, however, deep his guilt, we do not know in these times where the
process is going to stop. An evil precedent would be created, and we should assuredly have cause to
rue it.
Sir Herbert Stephen points out that, because the Kaiser cannot be "tried," it does not in the least
follow that it is impossible to punish him. Napoleon had no trial, yet we interned him until his death
upon the island of St. Helena. The fact that he was declared an outlaw by the Congress of Vienna,
presumably had no legal sanction. I take it that we based our action upon his surrender as a prisoner
of war. Some similar course could probably be adopted with the Kaiser, though as to its legality I can
express no opinion. What I am chiefly against is the illegal taking of life; and I cannot recall any case
in history where the killing of a monarch under pseudo-legal forms has not in the end done far more
harm than good.
Where public opinion in this country has gone astray is in concentrating all its wrath upon the
contemptible and fugitive Kaiser. He has more blood-guiltiness than any man on earth since Genghiz
Khan, but he does not stand alone. Whatever punishment is meted out to him should be shared by
the men who stood around him.
| To Hang or not to Hang |
| A Guilty Nation |
Punish these men by all means, with such severity as is not incompatible
with observance of the law. My feeling is, however, that the guilt for
countless crimes is shared in almost equal measure by the whole German
nation. My anxiety is lest the guilt of all Germans should be obscured by
concentration upon the guilt of a handful of leaders. When we have
administered what punishment we may to the Kaiser and a few of his
satellites, the German nation will instantly declare that their collective
criminality has been expiated, They will tell us that it was all the Kaiser's
fault, and the more we denounce the Kaiser exclusively the more we play
into their hands.
with observance of the law. My feeling is, however, that the guilt for
countless crimes is shared in almost equal measure by the whole German
nation. My anxiety is lest the guilt of all Germans should be obscured by
concentration upon the guilt of a handful of leaders. When we have
administered what punishment we may to the Kaiser and a few of his
satellites, the German nation will instantly declare that their collective
criminality has been expiated, They will tell us that it was all the Kaiser's
fault, and the more we denounce the Kaiser exclusively the more we play
into their hands.
Having committed themselves to the trial of the Kaiser by a clause in the Peace Treaty, the Allies went through the
formality of addressing a note to the Netherlands Government on January 16, 1920 referring to the Kaiser's "immense
responsibility" and asking for him to be handed over "in order that he may be sent for trial." The refusal of the Netherlands
Government on January 23rd and was immediately accepted. However, before the decision was publicly known, and
even after it became clear that the Government of Holland would not give him up, the "Hang the Kaiser" campaign was
begun, and candidates in the British General Election of 1918 who would not commit themselves to this policy lost votes.
formality of addressing a note to the Netherlands Government on January 16, 1920 referring to the Kaiser's "immense
responsibility" and asking for him to be handed over "in order that he may be sent for trial." The refusal of the Netherlands
Government on January 23rd and was immediately accepted. However, before the decision was publicly known, and
even after it became clear that the Government of Holland would not give him up, the "Hang the Kaiser" campaign was
begun, and candidates in the British General Election of 1918 who would not commit themselves to this policy lost votes.
---------------------------------